|
What’s there in the Philippine
presidency that makes it a hotly contested position?
P6 billion bet for P60,000 prize
by Roly E. Eclevia
If you’re
wondering why corruption is so prevalent in the government
look to the country’s electoral process for the answer.
According to political analysts the winning candidate for
the presidency, incumbent President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo,
spent as much as P6 billion in the runup to the May 10 elections.
On the other hand, actor Fernando Poe Jr., threw away half
of that amount.
In 1992, Fidel V. Ramos and his allies disbursed something
like P2 billion to ensure his victory. Six years later, when
Joseph Estrada sought the highest office of the land, his
supporters forked over P4 billion for the purpose. ‘Tis
said the actor-turned-politician received much more in contributions,
but he was so popular with the masses that he thought he could
keep a large part of the war chest without jeopardizing his
chances of winning, and that was exactly what he did. He was
right.
Why all that money? First off, the party standard bearer
needs to buy airtime and advertising space for himself, the
vice-presidential candidate, and the entire senatorial lineup
and, of course, to get those posters plastered all over the
islands. But that’s nothing compared to the outright
dole-out demanded by candidates at the local level--candidates
for congressmen, governors, and mayors. It is these politicians
who must feed and pay off people during the campaign period
and herd them to the polling precincts on election day.
The amount each candidate receives does not include cuts
already made from government contracts, estimated to be as
much as 30 percent of the total cost. Of course, only incumbent
government officials enjoy that advantage. Their rivals to
the posts just have to find solace in the thought that they
too will have their turn at the trough someday.
There is a nice piece of legislation on election spending,
but it is more honored in the breach than in the observance.
The statute provides that a presidential candidate may spend
three pesos for every voter. If you multiply that by 35 million,
the number of registered voters, you come up with . . . ,
go figure it out.
For remuneration the president can expect P60,000 a month
or P432 million for the single six-year term limit. The constitution
bars a president from reelection. Mrs. Macapagal-Arroyo’s
case is different. She was elected vice-president. Only upon
the ouster of the elected president did she assume the office.
The president does not pay any rent to stay in the palace,
it is true. Nor does he scrounge around like the rest of us
to pay the bills, or buy the groceries, or amortize the family
car. The state shoulders everything including entertainment,
which could add up to a pretty sum if the president, as the
previous one showed, happens to have a taste for pretty women
and expensive wines.
Still the perks do not come anywhere near the great fortune
required in the 90-day campaign period. One can only eat and
drink so much, after all. As for concupiscence, well, even
a satyr has his limitations.
Why would anybody spend so much for a position that pays
so little? The candidate does not spend his own money, of
course. But if you insist on an answer, he will tell you he
is motivated by something higher than profit like, uhm, service
to the people.
The national experience does not bear that out.
During his 20-year rule, Ferdinand Marcos repatriated billions
of dollars in government loan proceeds to Swiss banks, under
layers of dummies and numbered accounts. In a successful bid
to stifle all opposition and hide the crime, he disbanded
the legislature, closed down media outlets, and and sic-ed
the military and the police on the people.
Estrada, it turned out, was as voracious but not as clever
or imaginative. Like the small-town mayor that he had been,
he could only commit outright thievery, if the charges for
which he has been detained without bail are true. If there
was something he understood it was the need to systematize
collection in the illegal numbers game or jueteng, and he
proceeded to do just that, this time with the whole country
as his turf. He used the earnings to build palatial homes
for his mistresses.
The candidate relies on contributions from businessmen,
who shell out tens of millions of pesos each.
Here the assumption is that since the money the candidate
throws away is not his there is no compulsion on his part
to recoup it when he is elected. Things don’t work out
that way, unfortunately. A politician with larceny in his
heart will rob the country blind once he is in a position
of power, and it doesn’t matter how he gets there.
What sort of businessmen would risk millions in such a,
well, speculative venture? Obviously drug lords and smugglers.
Also, big-time tax evaders, current or prospective BIR and
Customs officials, even shabu manufacturers and distributors.
These people don’t give away money out of the goodness
of their heart. They consider it as an investment.
Back to top
|